Higher Ed's Neo-liberal Model Is Not Sustainable
Policy Makers Need to Toss Away the Language of Austerity and Reset Their Priorities
Geoffrey Johnson is an adjunct instructor in California who has been active in the fight over adjunctification of the academy. I was pointed in his direction by other activists who said he could offer me useful context as I reported on the adjunct issue and expanded my own activism through the adjunct faculty union at Rutgers University.
Adjunctification, a word that many in the academic labor movement view as problematic, refers to a Neo-liberal structural reformation of higher education labor, with fewer and fewer tenured and tenure-track faculty being hired. Instead, two- and four-years colleges and universities are relying on contingent or “casual” faculty, or those without tenure protection. About seven in 10 instructors are now contingent — which includes adjuncts like Johnson and like me, as well as graduate students and non-tenure or contract instructors who work full-time but lack long-term protection.
The move, as Joe Berry and Helena Worthen pointed out to me, gives university administration “flexibility” they say is necessary to deal with enrollment shifts. Academia has move to a just-in-time model for instruction, one similar to what we see in manufacturing a sector in which companies cut back on inventory and produce only what is needed at any given point. This saves companies money on inventory, but leaves them vulnerable to supply chain disruptions — such as the ones we have witnessed over the last two years.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Channel Surfing to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.